Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Obama's overhead projector

UPDATE: This more recent post is must-read: "McCain, Obama and the Adler Planetarium Projector"


The source for this commentary are my jots from having live-blogged the debate. See

Hands down, Obama handily won what was by far the most substantive of the three debates to date (for my commentary on the first debate see here, the second here).

I thought McCain's physical performance was shaky. He walked around as if lost, seemed hesitant to call Obama by name, otherwise acting as if he was afraid to get close to Obama.

If Obama hit a home run the debate, it was on the issue of health care:
Tom Brokaw: Health care: is it a privilege, a right, or a responsibility?
McCain: Responsibility -- for every American. (Bad answer. Obama should say: "It's a right!"- - because it is everywhere else in the developed world)
Obama: I think it should be a right for every American. (YES!) For sick to have to argue with insurance companies, that's fundamentally wrong. No 1: If you got an insurance plan you like, you can keep it. Because children are relatively cheap to insure. McCain doesn't say that he voted against expansion of kid's health insurance. Final point: it's true that I think it's important to crack down on insurance companies that are cheating their customers. It's a problem, these companies will find a state, where there are no requirements to get cancer screens. They all set up shop there. Works that way in banking. Delaware. They go.... Protections you have.... M believes in deregulation in every sense.
Health care is a right. In 2008, how can a leader in a Western country suggest it is anything other than a right?

Obama just may have hit it out of the ballpark tonight. He just may have won the election.

My sense that the election could be over is not based on Obama's health care answer alone. I suspect Obama cut into McCain's longstanding lead on national security. In contrast to the first debate, Obama had rebuttals against McCain on the foreign policy issues (Obama still agreed with McCain, but nevertheless managed to explain some shortcoming with McCain's positions). In fact, Obama shot down two of McCain's strongest answers of the night.
McCain: Roosevelt "talk softly.... big stick" When you announce, you turn Pakistan opinion against us. We washed hands of Afghan after 1990. Our relations with Pak critical. Petreus had strategy, get support of people. We need to help Pak in NW to get support of people. Not threatening to attack. Use force where necessary (McCain at his best).

Obama: I want to be clear, if Pak unable or unwilling to get Bin Laden, then we should, because they are threatening to kill Bin Laden. M saying bomb iran, next he's calling for invasion of N Korea. Not finished in Afghan, and M says next stop Baghdad. (Great response! You are destroying M's greatest strength, taking the battle to his home territory).
The second blow against McCain here was self-inflicted. McCain made the mistake of responding:
McCain: Not true. I understand what it's like to send people into harms way. I was joking with a veteran about saying I would attack Iran. (Joking about attacking? McCain, you are not helping yourself).
But the second win for Obama I was referring to came here:
McCain: I hope Iran abandons quest for nukes. We can never allow a second Holocaust to take place. (As if Israel will allow it either, with its 65 nuclear weapons).

Obama: We cannot allow Iran to get nuke. Will never take military options off the table. No veto power to UN. (Obama is matching McCain on toughness, it's a strategy not to give McCain an advantage on this score). When you talk to these countries it gives you better options. Talk, but don't take military option off the table (Obama won this exchange one with this point).
I honestly don't think McCain can recover at this point. To turn around the election, McCain would have to resort to some kind of "nuclear option." Obama came across as highly competent and cool-headed.

One last thing, a couple times McCain seemed concerned about Obama's purchase of an expensive overhead projector. But do we care?*
*UPDATE: It seems "we should care." McCain was actually criticizing Obama for funding an important educational initiative for the city of Chicago. See this new post.


  1. Reginald SelkirkOctober 08, 2008

    What McCain called (twice) an "overhead projector" is a star projection system for Adler Planetarium. yes, I care that McCain is derisively ridiculing science education.

  2. Reginald,

    Thanks for you the link.

    I had not heard McCain say the word "planetarium".

    I don't think a $3 million expenditure ought to be mentioned twice in a presidential debate. Especially, not at time when the government says it is forced to -- quite indiscriminately -- distribute well over $1 trillion to bail out banks.

    The fact the money was actually consigned toward such a good cause suggests McCain has even less sense than the mere mention of such a paltry figure twice would suggest.

    Your point is a good one. Especially as McCain is said to be not well acquainted with technologies such as "The Google," and email.

  3. I kinda cringed when Obama brought up health care providers setting up shop in unregulated states, like the banking industry did in Delaware.

    Umm. let's see what is the name of that senator from Delaware? I think his nickname was the "Senator from MBNA". Joe something or other...


  4. Mike,

    Yes, I wondered about that comment also.

    Nevertheless, it is state government, not really the federal government that makes Delaware laws so favorable to financial corporations. Obama probably concluded that the Republicans are not about to start launching attacks against their friends at MBNA.

    Republicans don't want to attack the financial industry too hard, that's why they keep talking about Freddie and Fannie.

  5. this is simply hilarious !

    who gives a f*** about Obomba or McBush anymore? both of them are same: they not gonna solve the problems US has got itself and THE WHOLE WORLD into !

    all this nonsense of "debates" only a distraction for flags-waving sheeple from the REAL issues - that US is increasingly becoming a Fascist Corpocracy !

  6. Reginald SelkirkOctober 09, 2008

    I kinda cringed when Obama brought up health care providers setting up shop in unregulated states, like the banking industry did in Delaware.

    I thought the same thing. But later, when McCain said "We don't have time for on-the-job training, my friends," I thought of McCain's running mate selection.


Because all comments on this blog are moderated, there will be some delay before your comment is approved.